Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
2.
Andrologia ; 54(10): e14563, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2019117

ABSTRACT

Although mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have proven to be safe and effective against SARS-CoV-2, vaccination rates have slowed, with some individuals citing impotence as a concern. Therefore, we conducted a survey of the US males to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on erectile function. We hypothesized that vaccinated men would not have a higher risk of ED compared to unvaccinated men. Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) was utilized to survey the US adult male population between August 26 and September 2, 2021. Survey participation was open to 1000 males over the age of 18 and currently living in the United States regardless of vaccination status or the past medical history of COVID-19. Selection criteria included respondents ≥45 years old, no history of physician-diagnosed ED, biologically born, and identify as male. Participants completed an anonymous 16-question survey that included a multidimensional scale used to evaluate ED, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5). Among vaccinated men, the median IIEF-5 score was 20 [16-24] compared to 22 [17.5-25] in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.195). The multivariable-adjusted analysis demonstrated that vaccination against COVID-19 was not associated with increased risk of ED. Overall, this cross-sectional survey showed that COVID-19 vaccination was not associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction in males 45 years and older.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Erectile Dysfunction , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Erectile Dysfunction/diagnosis , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
3.
F S Rep ; 3(3): 211-213, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2016216

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine whether the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines can negatively impact the semen parameters of young healthy men in the long-term. Design: We conducted semen analyses on 12 men before, 3 and 9 months after achieving fully vaccinated status. Individuals who admitted a history of infertility or previous azoospermia were excluded from study participation. Subjects: Healthy male volunteers between the ages of 18-50 years old were recruited between September 2021 - March 2022. Main Outcome Measures: Semen analyses were performed and evaluated volume, sperm concentration, total motility, and total motile sperm count (TMSC). The primary outcome was median change in the TMSC at baseline, 3 months, and at least 9 months following vaccination. Results: A total of 12 men volunteered in our study (median age 26 [25 - 30] years). Subjects provided follow-up semen samples at a median of 10 months following the second vaccine dose. There were no significant changes in any semen parameters between baseline, 3 months, and 10 months following vaccination. Baseline samples demonstrated median sperm concentrations and TMSC of 29.5 million/cc [9.3 - 49] and 31 million [4-51.3], respectively. At 9-month follow-up, sperm concentration and TMSC were 43 [20.5 - 63.5] (P=.351) and 37.5 [8.5 - 117.8] (P=.519), respectively. Of note, there were no significant changes in semen volume nor total motility (%) for participants at follow-up. Conclusion: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the booster dose does not appear to negatively impact the semen parameters of healthy males up to 10 months following vaccination.

4.
Am J Clin Exp Urol ; 10(4): 199-209, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2011144

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 infection arose in 2019 and has changed life as we know it. With our ever-advancing knowledge, therapies, and vaccines, more functions of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are being investigated outside of its pulmonary invasion. Here, we set out to review the current and pertinent literature on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on the male genitourinary system including the bladder, lower urinary tract, prostate, testis, and penis. The biggest newsworthy stake was if SARS-CoV-2 could be transmitted through semen. Although initially thought to occur, more recent studies have opposed this hypothesis. Outside of the reproductive spread of SARS-CoV-2, multiple studies in this review highlight where the virus resides and what effect it may be having on this genitourinary system including increased voiding problems, viral persistence months after systemic clearance, and rare penile complications post-infection. Long-term outcomes are still needed to fully understand how SARS-CoV-2 infection can alter the genitourinary system.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL